- Mozambique vote: no suspense but some disillusion
- Austrian rapper channels anti-racist rage in Romani hip-hop songs
- Ohtani magic powers Dodgers over Padres in MLB playoff thriller
- Five of the best: Pakistan-England Test thrillers
- Man sets arm on fire as marches across US mark Gaza war anniversary
- Vietnam's young coffee entrepreneurs brew up a revolution
- Trump rallies at site of failed assassination: 'Never quit'
- Too hot by day, Dubai's floodlit beaches are packed at night
- Is music finally reckoning with #MeToo?
- Fans hail Trump's 'guts' as he returns to site of rally shooting
- Lebanon state media says Israeli strikes hit south Beirut
- Miami on track for MLS record points after win in Toronto
- Monaco take top spot in Ligue 1 with win at Rennes
- Madrid beat Villarreal to level Liga leaders Barca
- Thuram treble fires Inter past Torino and up to second
- 'Fight': defiant Trump jets in to site of rally shooting
- Mexico City's new mayor sworn in with pledges on water, housing
- Israel on alert ahead of Hamas attack anniversary
- Guardians maul Tigers in MLB playoff series opener
- Macron criticises Israel on Gaza, Lebanon operations
- French rugby player whistled but 'serene' on return amid ongoing rape case
- Retegui hat-trick fires five-star Atalanta to hammering of Genoa
- Heavyweights Australia, England off to World Cup winning starts
- Visiting UN refugee agency chief decries 'terrible crisis' in Lebanon
- Spinners come to party as England defeat Bangladesh at T20 World Cup
- Search continues for missing in deadly Bosnia floods
- Man City sink Fulham to get title bid back on track
- France's Auradou whistled on Pau return in Perpignan loss amid ongoing rape case
- A 'forgotten' valley in storm-hit North Carolina, desperate for help
- Arsenal hit back in style after Southampton scare
- Hezbollah heir apparent Safieddine out of contact after strikes
- Liverpool stay top of Premier League as Arsenal, Man City win
- In dank Tour of Emilia, Pogacar shines in rainbow jersey
- DR Congo launches mpox vaccination drive, hoping to curb outbreak
- Trump returns to site of failed assassination
- Careless Leverkusen held to Bundesliga draw
- O'Brien's 'superstar' Kyprios posts landmark win on Arc weekend
- Liverpool suffer Alisson injury blow
- Habosi helps Racing beat Vannes before Auradou's playing return
- Thousands march in London in support of Palestinians, 1 year after Oct 7
- Israel readying response to Iran missile attack
- Schutt, Mooney help Australia beat Sri Lanka in Women's T20 World Cup
- Liverpool extend Premier League lead with win at Palace
- Djokovic 'shakes rust off' to make third round of Shanghai Masters
- 'Imperfect' PSG fighting on all fronts - Luis Enrique
- Struggling Pakistan look to thwart adaptable England
- Child 'trampled to death' in asylum seekers' Channel crossing: minister
- Gauff fights back to set up Beijing final against Muchova
- Guardiola claims Premier League won't delay season for Man City
- Israel to mark October 7 attack as Gaza war spreads
German govt loses key case on debt rules at top court
Germany's top court ruled Wednesday against the government in a case centred on whether it had broken debt rules, wiping 60 billion euros from a key climate fund and further testing the unity of the ruling coalition.
The Federal Constitutional Court had been examining accusations from the main opposition CDU party that Chancellor Olaf Scholz's ruling coalition has acted in contravention of the "debt brake".
This key commitment to balanced budgets caps Germany's new borrowing to 0.35 percent of gross domestic product.
The brake was suspended from 2020-2022 to deal with shocks from the coronavirus pandemic and energy crisis, as is permitted during emergencies, but came back into force this year.
The court case centred on a change to accounting rules for funds outside the main budget that was implemented last year by the centre-left-led coalition, giving it more room for deficit spending outside times of crisis.
In particular, it looked at a decision to transfer 60 billion euros ($65 billion) of loan authorisations that had been part of pandemic support programmes to a fund aimed mainly at fighting climate change.
The court in Karlsruhe, southwest Germany, found this move was "incompatible" with the constitution and overturned it, ruling in favour of a legal complaint lodged by the CDU.
"The court's decision means that the volume of the 'climate and transformation fund' is reduced by 60 billion euros," it said in a statement.
If the state "has entered into obligations that it can no longer service as a result of this reduction," it must be compensated for "through other means".
The court underlined that the "de facto unlimited use of emergency borrowing authorisations in subsequent fiscal years" without accounting for them in those years and instead counting them in the previous fiscal year is "impermissible".
The ruling, which essentially outlaws the rolling over of funds for other uses, could have implications for other "off-budget funds" set up by the government, analysts have said.
The decision is also likely to further strain ties within Scholz's three-party coalition, particularly with the pro-market FDP, which pushed to ensure the debt brake was reinstated and is seeking to rein in spending.
- Debt debate -
The climate fund -- worth 212 billion euros before the ruling -- is aimed in large part at speeding up Germany's shift to an emissions-free economy, with measures such as helping cover the cost of replacing gas boilers with more climate-friendly heat pumps.
The coalition argued the fund was not part of the main budget, and thus not relevant in calculating whether the debt brake was being respected.
But law professor Hanno Kube, who advised the plaintiffs, told AFP that "the purpose of the fund is not an emergency situation... but a long-term challenge, the fight against climate change".
In court hearings in June, the government argued the climate fund also addressed long-running consequences of the pandemic.
But Kube dismissed this, saying the green transition was not "at all linked to overcoming the economic crisis linked to the coronavirus".
The court's ruling, which comes after nearly five months of deliberations, will likely further fuel ongoing debates around whether the debt brake needs to be relaxed.
While the FDP has pushed for it to be kept in place, Economy Minister Robert Habeck of the Green party called last month for the rules to be redesigned for times of crisis.
A strict spending limit had been designed in an era of benign "globalisation, friendly coexistence and cheap Russian gas", which had now come to an end, Habeck said.
G.M.Castelo--PC