- Dutch plan 'nice adios' for Nadal at Davis Cup retirement party
- Trump meets PGA boss and Saudi PIF head amid deal talks: report
- UN chief urges G20 'leadership' on stalled climate talks
- Steelers edge Ravens, Lions maul Jaguars
- No.1 Korda wins LPGA Annika for seventh title of the season
- Biden touts climate legacy in landmark Amazon visit
- England secure Nations League promotion, France beat Italy
- Star power fails to perk up France's premiere wine auction
- Rabiot brace fires France past Italy and top of Nations League group
- Carsley relieved to sign off with Nations League promotion for England
- Sinner says room to improve in 2025 after home ATP Finals triumph
- Senegal counts votes as new leaders eye parliamentary win
- Lebanon says second Israeli strike on central Beirut kills two
- Puerto Rico's Campos wins first PGA title at Bermuda
- Harwood-Bellis risks wedding wrath from Keane after England goal
- 'Nobody can reverse' US progress on clean energy: Biden
- NBA issues fines to Hornets guard Ball, T-Wolves guard Anthony
- Biden allows Ukraine to strike Russia with long-range missiles: US official
- Britain dump out holders Canada to reach BJK Cup semi-finals
- Biden clears Ukraine for missile strikes inside Russia
- Ukrainians brave arduous journeys to Russian-occupied homeland
- Australia not focusing on Grand Slam sweep after thrashing Wales
- Wales's rugby woes -- three talking points
- Jannik Sinner, the atypical Italian star on top of the tennis world
- 'Devil is in the details,' EU chief says of S.America trade deal
- Kusal Mendis defies injury as Sri Lanka beat New Zealand to clinch ODI series
- Gatland would back change after Australia condemn Wales to record defeat
- England secure Nations League promotion, Haaland inspires Norway
- Sinner sweeps past Fritz to win ATP Finals
- Mahrez scores as five-goal Algeria crush Liberia
- Toll in Tanzania building collapse rises to 13, survivors trapped
- 'Red One' tops N.America box office but could end up in the red
- NATO's largest artillery exercise underway in Finland
- Australia condemn Wales to record 11th successive loss in 52-20 rout
- Russian opposition marches against Putin in Berlin
- Dozens killed, missing in Israeli strike on devastated north Gaza
- Macron defends French farmers in talks with Argentina's Milei
- England players to blame for losing streak says captain George
- 'Emotional' Martin defies Bagnaia to claim first MotoGP world championship
- Slovakia beat Australia to reach BJK Cup semi-finals
- Sluggish Italy fight to narrow win over Georgia
- India and Nigeria renew ties as Modi visits
- Grit and talent, a promise and a dilemma: three things about Jorge Martin
- Martin denies Bagnaia to win first MotoGP world championship
- Typhoon Man-yi weakens as it crosses Philippines' main island
- Noel wins season-opening slalom in Levi as Hirscher struggles
- Tough questions for England as Springboks make it five defeats in a row
- Russia pounds Ukraine with 'massive' attack in 'hellish' night
- McIlroy clinches Race to Dubai title with DP World Tour Championship win
- Glastonbury 2025 tickets sell out in 35 minutes
Pitt sues Jolie over sale of French vineyard where they married
Brad Pitt is suing Angelina Jolie for selling her share of the French vineyard where they got married.
Superstars Pitt and Jolie, who were once Hollywood's highest profile couple, bought a controlling stake of Chateau Miraval in southern France in 2008, and tied the knot there six years later.
But they filed to dissolve their marriage in 2016 and have remained locked in court battles since, including over custody rights for their six children.
According to a lawsuit filed by Pitt in California on Thursday, the couple had "agreed they would never sell their respective interests in Miraval without the other's consent."
But last October, Jolie sold her stake to a "a Luxembourg-based spirits manufacturer controlled by Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler," the legal document obtained by AFP says.
Pitt's filing alleges that Jolie broke the terms of their original agreement by not offering him first refusal for her share, and that she is seeking to "recover unearned windfall profits for herself while inflicting gratuitous harm on Pitt."
"Jolie long ago stopped contributing to Miraval -- while Pitt poured money and sweat equity into the wine business, building it into the ascendant company it is today," it states.
Pitt's lawsuit requests a trial by jury.
It describes the vineyard as a "small, unprofitable wine business" that was "in need of renovation" prior to the couple's purchase in 2008.
The pair paid "approximately 25 million euros," with Pitt contributing 60 per cent and Jolie the remaining 40 per cent.
But Pitt went on to pay for renovations "in a manner far disproportionate to his relative ownership share" on the understanding Jolie would not pull out of the investment without his consent, the suit says.
Pitt brought in Marc Perrin, one of France's top winemakers, to help transform the business into a leading rose wine producer, but "Jolie had no involvement in these efforts," it continues.
Revenues reportedly grew from approximately $3 million in 2013 to more than $50 million last year.
Jolie's representatives did not immediately respond to an AFP request for comment.
The A-listers first became a couple after co-starring as married assassins in 2004 film "Mr. and Mrs. Smith." Pitt was married to Jennifer Aniston at the time.
Pitt, now 58, was accused of striking one of his children during a flight from France to Los Angeles shortly before Jolie filed for divorce, but was later cleared by the FBI and social workers.
The pair announced in 2018 they had reached an amicable settlement over the children -- three biological and three adopted.
But last July, Jolie scored a win in their custody battle as the private judge overseeing their divorce and custody matters was disqualified from the case.
Judge John Ouderkirk -- who had also officiated their wedding at the vineyard -- was found to have financially benefited from separate work with Pitt's attorneys, and disqualified from the case by a California appeals court.
The ruling means the custody case essentially had to be restarted before a new judge.
A.Motta--PC