![US top court declines to curb govt contact with social media firms](https://www.portugalcolonial.pt/media/shared/articles/01/a7/74/US-top-court-declines-to-curb-govt--155861.jpg)
-
Missing Wimbledon would not have been 'correct', says Djokovic
-
Russell plans to 'sneak through' front two in Austria
-
Kohli leads the way as India set SA 177 to win
-
France's Bardet wins Tour de France opener as Cavendish suffers
-
Imperious Verstappen takes pole for Austrian Grand Prix
-
Top seed Fritz wins third Eastbourne ATP title
-
Bagnaia turns the heat up on MotoGP leader Martin
-
Cheers and prayers in India as T20 World Cup cricket final begins
-
Attacker with crossbow killed outside Israeli embassy in Belgrade, officer wounded
-
Haiti PM visits US, to meet with White House official
-
India win toss and bat in T20 World Cup final
-
Second-time lucky for Kasatkina as she wins Eastbourne WTA final
-
Heptathlon world champion Johnson-Thompson allays Olympic fitness worries
-
Zverev says 'most open Wimbledon in 20 years'
-
Sabalenka 'not 100%' certain for Wimbledon due to 'rare' injury
-
Fighting for third day in north Gaza as thousands displaced
-
'We have already won the Euros', says Georgia coach Sagnol
-
Manchester United's Earps latest to leave WSL club
-
Tense France goes to polls as far-right scents power
-
Mauvaka rewarded with Toulouse contract extension
-
Reformist to face ultraconservative in Iran presidency runoff
-
Verstappen resists Norris attack to win Austrian GP sprint race
-
Afghan women's rights an internal issue, Taliban govt says before UN-led talks
-
Pogacar favourite as Tour de France sets off from Florence
-
Clashes, arrests mark start of German far-right AfD congress
-
Five IS bombs found hidden in iconic Iraq mosque: UN agency
-
Mongolia ruling party wins reduced majority in vote dominated by graft
-
'Revolutionary' Dupont turns focus to Olympics after record Top 14 success
-
Panamanian court acquits 28 defendants in 'Panama Papers' trial
-
Fans pray for India's elusive world cricket trophy
-
Reformist, ultraconservative lead Iran presidential vote
-
Biden takes stage with Elton John to celebrate LGBTQ milestone
-
Legal weed limps into next phase in Germany
-
Vietnam economy expands 6.4 percent in first half of year
-
Thompson, Jackson win 100m titles at Jamaican Olympic trials
-
Holloway makes Olympics with 110 hurdles win as Lyles, Richardson roll on
-
Mauritania heads to polls with incumbent tipped to win
-
Planting giant cactus to stave off desertification in Brazil
-
Protests expected at German far-right AfD congress
-
Far right scents power as tense France ready for snap vote
-
Suspected leaders of failed Bolivian coup remanded in custody
-
Biden, Trump battle for blue-collar voters as steel merger looms
-
Biles one step closer to Paris with day one US gymnastics trials lead
-
Union says Boeing penny-pinching has hurt supply chain
-
US, allies condemn N.Korea for sanctions-busting arms sales to Russia
-
Colombia into Copa quarters after Costa Rica romp
-
England's Rai and USA's Bhatia share PGA Detroit lead
-
Danes shoot 60 to join five-way tie for LPGA pairs lead
-
Messi to miss Argentina-Peru Copa clash: team
-
Global stocks mixed as elections heat up
![US top court declines to curb govt contact with social media firms](https://www.portugalcolonial.pt/media/shared/articles/01/a7/74/US-top-court-declines-to-curb-govt--155861.jpg)
US top court declines to curb govt contact with social media firms
The US Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a Republican-led bid to curb government contact with social media companies to moderate their content, a ruling that could bolster official efforts to fight misinformation in a key election year.
The decision hands a win to President Joe Biden's administration and top government agencies ahead of the presidential vote in November, allowing them to continue notifying major platforms such as Facebook and X about what they deem as false or hateful content.
The justices, voting 6-3, threw out the case on the grounds that the challengers -- including two states and social media users -- had not suffered a direct injury that provided a legal standing to sue.
"The plaintiffs, without any concrete link between their injuries and the defendants' conduct, ask us to conduct a review of the years-long communications between dozens of federal officials, across different agencies, with different social-media platforms, about different topics," Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the majority.
"This court's standing doctrine prevents us from (exercising such) general legal oversight of the other branches of government."
The decision was a setback for conservative advocates who allege that the government has pressured or colluded with major platforms to censor right-leaning content under the guise of fighting misinformation.
"For months, high-ranking government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to suppress Americans' free speech," wrote Justice Samuel Alito, who dissented along with Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch.
"Because the court unjustifiably refuses to address this serious threat to the First Amendment, I respectfully dissent," Alito added, asserting that one of the plaintiffs had a legal standing to sue.
- 'Pivotal' timing -
Firebrand Republican lawmaker Jim Jordan, who has steered a sweeping legal offensive against misinformation researchers, also voiced disappointment over the ruling.
"The First Amendment is first for a reason, and the freedom of expression should be protected from any infringement by the government," Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement.
"While we respectfully disagree with the court's decision, our investigation has shown the need for legislative reforms... to better protect Americans harmed by the unconstitutional censorship-industrial complex."
The case stems from a lawsuit brought by the Republican attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri, who alleged that government officials went too far in their bid to get platforms to combat vaccine and election misinformation, violating First Amendment free speech rights of social media users.
Last year, a lower court restricted top officials and agencies in Biden's administration from meeting and communicating with social media companies to flag what they considered harmful posts.
The lower court order applied to the White House and a slew of agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the State Department, the Justice Department as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Some experts in misinformation and First Amendment law criticized the lower court ruling, saying the authorities needed to strike a balance between calling out falsehoods and veering towards censorship or curbing free speech.
The lawsuits intended to "weaponize" the First Amendment, which would have undermined the government's ability to defend the United States against election interference and disinformation campaigns, watchdog group Accountable Tech said as it welcomed Wednesday's ruling.
"Cooperation between the government and platforms about foreign influence campaigns, election integrity and public health emergencies is essential to preserving public safety and a healthy democracy," the group said in a statement.
"This decision comes at a pivotal time just months before the November election, as tech companies cut back on trust and safety teams and are recklessly deploying new AI products that are contributing to accelerated online disinformation."
A.Magalhes--PC